As indicated in the circuit demonstration,
we consider an RLC circuit, shown below, as a model for a radio tuner.
Here the input voltage \(E(t)\) is the signal that is being received by
the tuner. We expect that this will be a combination of a number of
different radio signals that are broadcast with different frequencies.
\(R\), \(L\) and \(C\) are the resistance, inductance and capacitance in
the circuit. We can adjust the capacitance \(C\) to select one
frequency in the input—that is, by changing \(C\) we can make the
(long-term) behavior of the system mirror only one of the
frequencies in the input function \(E(t)\).
As indicated in the circuit demonstration, we let \(I\) be the current in the circuit. Then Kirchoff's second law (that the sum of the voltage drops in the circuit must equal the input voltage) and the elementary laws of electricity give \[ L\,I'' + R\,I' + \frac{1}{C}\,I = E'(t) \] (as shown in [1] or [2]).
Following [1], we might take \(L = 1\)H (Henry, the unit of inductance) and \(R = 0.1\Omega\) (Ohms, the unit of resistance). Then, we may suppose that the input voltage is a combination of several carrier signals with different frequencies; for example, we might take \(E(t) = -\cos(t) - 4\cos(5t)\). For initial conditions, if there is initially no current, \(I(0) = 0\) and \(I'(0) = (E(0) - q_0/C)/L\). The question for the tuner is how to pick \(C\) so that \(I(t)\) looks like only one of the terms in the input \(E(t)\).
This question can be rephrased slightly by considering the response to a single input frequency: if \(E(t) = -\cos(\omega t)\), and asking what value of \(C\) will produce the largest amplitude response (and, correspondingly, what values produce a very small response). Turning the question around slightly, we could also ask for a given value of \(C\) what value(s) of \(\omega\) have the largest response. The demonstrations below explore these questions.
Our demos collection:
Response_Simple.m
. In
this case, the homogeneous and particular solutions are graphed in
the upper window and amplitude vs. frequency in the lower. Results
are shown for a list of frequencies, with pauses between each. This
differs from Response_Simple.m
in that it does not show
variation as a function of the spring (inductance) term \(k\) (or
\(c\)), some parameter settings, the solutions being graphed, and
its treatment of the maximum amplitude in the case of resonance
(where the response amplitude graphed is the maximum amplitude in
the solution graph).
[show
figure]
Some questions that may be worth considering: